They are a way to keep the dead alive. The first draft of the Epilogue to The World According to Garp was twice as long as any of the other chapters. I remember thinking the title of my fourth novel would change; The World According to Garp was always just a working title until something better came along Superior fiction asks three things of the novelist: Vigorous feeling for life as we live it. Then imaginative force, strong enough to subvert and rebuild unhindered.
There wasn't too much violence. I didn't like that every male character was sleeping around despite mostly being married, as if this was and is the norm. Nor the way the men were lusting after all the women all of the time and being loudly vocal about it. Perhaps, this is what happens in some segments of society but I'm sure it's not the case everywhere! At least, I hope not. So, what did I learn from my diversion into secular science fiction?
That popular authors have to write R rated material to keep an audience entertained. That a lot of readers wouldn't bat on eyelid at the content as it's become commonplace I can't give this more than two stars View 1 comment. Jan 15, Rick Monkey rated it liked it. So I was, like, really broke towards the tail end of last month. And, lemme tell ya, pickings are slim. So I got a Michael Crichton book. I'm very ashamed. More so because I actually, well, liked it. Crichton, I think, resonates so well with middle-of-the-road audiences because his takes on science and technology tend to play to the common man's fe So I was, like, really broke towards the tail end of last month.
Crichton, I think, resonates so well with middle-of-the-road audiences because his takes on science and technology tend to play to the common man's fear that it's all spiraling out of control. It feeds the idea that scientists are unscrupulous, insane dirtbags. Next really isn't that different. There's a lot of unscrupulous science going on here.
And it's a very didactic book, a lot of exposition, a lot of information, and a clear bias. Just like most other Michael Crichton sci-fi thrillers. The difference here is that, well, he might actually be right. When you talk about things such as corporate ownership of portions of the genome, patenting of individual genes, ownership of cells being given to someone other than the person those cells came from - this is all stuff that's happening right now. And it's stuff that cannot, in any way, be good. And, yeah, there are some subplots about transgenic animals. They're fun - mostly because, hey, who doesn't love a talking animal - but they're not what this is about.
The concern here isn't even necessarily about the science, it's about the greed that has warped the science. So, thematically, it's terribly compelling. In actual execution, well Even when you have interesting themes, they're really just the window dressing for chases, shootouts, mistaken identities, unbelievable coincidences and, yeah, talking monkeys. View all 3 comments. RTC So I got this in a book haul and so excited to read this! I don't think I've been more excited to read a Crichton book after reading up on the premise of this story!!!
This was not necessarily a bad novel I still rated it right around average! I think where Next fails is that Mr. Crichton tried to get too many storylines going in order to have them all running simultaneously in an effort to show a more grand scope to his issues of possible problems with genetic research.
The main problem here is that many of the characters became washed out and meaningless. There is just so m This was not necessarily a bad novel I still rated it right around average! There is just so much going on with so many different characters that I kept having to reset and figure out who was who and exactly what was going on with them. I think that he had the bones here to craft a really good storyline, but would have benefited tremendously from a heavy dose of self-editing and then expanding the tales of those characters that he felt most essential to keep.
What came out of this book for me was confusing and subsequently, quite boring. Michael Crichton is one of my favorite authors in contemporary fiction however and I am not discouraged enough by one stinker to stop reading his novels. Nov 25, Kathy rated it it was amazing. This was riveting! The book is about all of the possibilities of gene therapy and genetic engineering and it blends fact and fiction in clever ways that leave the reader with the unnerving sense that some of the fictional story lines are probably happening somewhere in the world right now.
It also gives a strong sense of just how uncontrolled this field is and what ethical questions arise if a person allows a company to "purchase" their cell line It doesn't take too much of a leap of imagination to visualize very muddy ethical lines between a scientific pursuit of knowledge and the pursuit of the almighty dollar. I couldn't put it down! Jun 20, Sanjay Sanghoee rated it really liked it. Fantastic book. Immensely futuristic even as it shows you what is actually happening today.
The fact that transgenic animals have been created for decades was an eye-opener. The book clearly has a viewpoint on genetic engineering and there is an author's note at the end which is a must-read. Highly recommend this to anyone who is looking an intelligent thriller, even though the book is also satire. The later few Crichton novels seem to have a higher vision and intent than to only entertain; they also seek to educate and encourage debate.
To that end, Next throws light on areas such as the government's policies on intellectual property rights for genetic discoveries, the absurd practice of patenting entire genes and all uses and interactions that genome may carry out with anything else - in all of mankind and diseases, what exactly constitutes cell ownership, and the moral grey areas such The later few Crichton novels seem to have a higher vision and intent than to only entertain; they also seek to educate and encourage debate. To that end, Next throws light on areas such as the government's policies on intellectual property rights for genetic discoveries, the absurd practice of patenting entire genes and all uses and interactions that genome may carry out with anything else - in all of mankind and diseases, what exactly constitutes cell ownership, and the moral grey areas such as the ethics of genetic engineering, stem cell research and genetic therapy.
For example, I never thought about the impact that publishing a deceased's genetic information would have on their relatives and descendants with respect to insurance companies using the said info. The one irksome aspect is the high number of characters that keep getting introduced with plot lines of their own, with some of them made to cross over forcefully at Crichton's hand, who sacrifices pace in the narrative head so that he may bring to light the many different facets of the subject.
In one of the interviews included in the ebook version note: the two interviews and an essay by Crichton are all excellent , Crichton weighs-in: I think there were two considerations. The story, though it moves along quite nicely, doesn't really have a meaty enough middle to it well, except for Gerard, the talking African grey parrot, who's a riot , and is more a device for the larger intent and theme that Crichton has in mind. So, as a novel, I wouldn't rate this one too high.
But as a book, it's quite a good read. Mar 27, Jennifer rated it liked it Shelves: sci-fi-other. The Good: A fantastic premise, as always, from Crichton. Fact based, with completely terrifying implications, Next takes science today to that "next" step. If furthers things just a bit more, the ramifications of which give the readers a lot of troubling thoughts to consider.
The Bad: Crichton lost me at the money. Apparently, if you mix human and monkey DNA, a monkey will be born with human vocal capabilities. A monkey that you can pass off as a child with a hairy birth defect and some impulse c The Good: A fantastic premise, as always, from Crichton.
A monkey that you can pass off as a child with a hairy birth defect and some impulse control issues. The fact that this monkey was able to fool more than one person in this book was just ludicrous. I had a hard time taking anything seriously in the book after that. May 01, Ramon Remires rated it really liked it Shelves: great-asstars. It is a scientific thriller that tells about genetics.
Although I'm not familiar with science nor genetics in particular, yet it seems that Crichton did an excellent job in his scientific explanations. Two main drawbacks in the book- First of all, you have to be patient because Crichton is overly exaggerating with the scientific descriptions and genealogy articles that appear in each chapter. Second, the book has many characters, and finally, only at the end of all things, everything connects, so it It is a scientific thriller that tells about genetics.
Second, the book has many characters, and finally, only at the end of all things, everything connects, so it's a little hard to follow. Nevertheless, the result is satisfactory in my opinion - it is a fascinating thriller. Mar 20, Thom Dunn rated it liked it Shelves: sf-science-fiction , a-own-hardcover , sf-earth-is-room-enough , sf-genetics.
I finished NEXT last night, having taken two months of bedside reading to move through it leisurely. I also read several of the reviews on this web site. I wonder if those who complain it "has no plot" actually finished the book. Crichton DOES pull together his disparate plot lines in the last few chapters. Its important to keep in mind, as one reviewer pointed out, that Crichton is a satirist. Here he mixes his serious material with raw comedy, going way over the top at times.
In His Own Words
It might have he I finished NEXT last night, having taken two months of bedside reading to move through it leisurely. It might have helped if Crichton alas, the late Michael Crichton had put his chapter on background research up front; then his purposes might have been better revealed and fewer readers dissapointed or--if my suspicion is true--scared off. This is a fun book. Grim fun, to be sure, but that's often true of SF humor. Much of it is a send-up of that profile of high-seriousness that drug companies bring to all they do, often lulling the public into an acceptance of highly questionable methods.
Should we be pissed at Voltaire for taking his narrative "too far"? Crichton is not trying to paint an accurate picture here of how far things have come. Well, yes he is. Aug 01, bendyroad rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Nobody. I had been boycotting Michael Crichton since his unhelpful muddying of the waters of the climate change "debate" in his next-to-last novel which included a personal message to his readers that he didn't believe the issues were really human related at all. Read the IPCC report, you ignoramus. However, I was stuck in an airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico, having finished every novel in my bag and with the prospect of 12 hours of airplanes and airports ahead.
The novel selection in the airport shop w I had been boycotting Michael Crichton since his unhelpful muddying of the waters of the climate change "debate" in his next-to-last novel which included a personal message to his readers that he didn't believe the issues were really human related at all. The novel selection in the airport shop was a single shelf of chick lit and Clive Cusslers.
I was desperate. His newest hobbyhorse is genetics and the story, if you could call it that, is light window dressing for sociopolitical railery. He should have stuck to dinosaurs, not that the pseudoscientific scaffolding that Jurassic Park hung upon was any better, but at least we weren't subjected to his personal views to such an enfuriating degree.
I don't disagree that genetics, gene therapy, and copywriting of particular genes are bringing up some worrying issues but I don't need them pointed out to me by some hack writer in the guise of a novel. Don't even get me started on his Astrobiology book. Feb 18, Rashmi Banerjee rated it liked it. I love the way that Michael Crichton takes seemingly non-related parallel story lines and brings them all together in the end.
Being a scientist, the topic of this book was interesting to me and I liked the book. I could really do without the profanity in the book I must say that Crichton sure did exhaust it's usage I had to laugh when on page , one of the characters, "shouted and swor I love the way that Michael Crichton takes seemingly non-related parallel story lines and brings them all together in the end.
I had to laugh when on page , one of the characters, "shouted and swore. Even when the character was not directly talking or thinking, Crichton would use profanity as an adjective when describing what was going on. It took a 4-star book down to a 3-star for me. Dec 11, Kersten rated it it was amazing. This is classic Michael Crichton. I love his stories and how he intermingle science within a fictional novel. The story deals with the ethics and stories associated with bio genetics.
There is a long cast of characters and the author ties them together in the end which is probably a little too far fetched. However, it is a great way for me to get lost in an amazing world that Michael has a way of putting together.
This Life or the Next: A Novel
I am sad that he has passed away and will no longer be able to gift the world This is classic Michael Crichton. I am sad that he has passed away and will no longer be able to gift the world with his creativity. This book was recommended to me by my Dad, I'll always read anything he gives me. I read this a long time ago, I remember it being very scientific, so at times I did struggle to keep up and understand what was going on, but I remember it being brilliant.
A guy working with a monkey trying to find a cure? I will definitely have to re read this but I remember it being good. Reading this was like watching a badly written television series. Crichton tried way too hard to be sensational. Aug 05, Kandice rated it it was amazing. Anything monkey, gorilla Aug 29, Tim Martin rated it really liked it Shelves: science-fiction , reviewed.
Some parts are scary, though more in a sickening death-and-taxes-that-could-really-happen kind of way than an edge-of-your-seat-oh-my-goodness kind of way. Lots to dissect in this book; let's look at the two main plots to begin with. He thought the fetus - as most transgenic fetuses ended up being - would either die in the womb or otherwise die soon afterwards and he would have something for a research project. Owing to a series of events he lost track of the mother, the mother gave birth, and the transgenic animal - the humanzee - survived.
Harry, who left the lab, assumed the animal had died but was given a heads up by a former colleague that his humanzee, dubbed Dave, was going to be euthanasized. Bad enough to put down an animal that was after all the result of an illegal experiment , it got worse; Dave is sentient and can speak. Harry basically smuggled the animal out of the lab and did his best to keep him safe and then give him some kind of life. The other main plot revolved around a both chilling and perhaps insane saga.
It seems a man by the name of Frank Burnett had cancer and underwent some experimental treatment. Frank recovered, but not thanks to the researchers. It turned out that Frank's own body could manufacture powerful cancer-fighting components, and those components were valuable.
- Post navigation;
- The Possible Worlds of Hypertext Fiction.
- Join for free to save your favorite books!;
This being the day and age it is Frank sues of course. Why can't he get a cut of the immense profits? Don't they at least need his permission? Incredibly, in court Frank, represented by his daughter Alison lost. The company, BioGen, it is ruled owned those cells. Any cells that Frank lost during the hospital are considered waste material and he lost ownership rights to him, and when Rick patented his findings from studying those cells, Frank lost any chance to ever make any profit from that cell line.
Frank was about to give up and go home after losing the court case when an unscrupulous and shady character comes up with a proposal; what if BioGen were to "accidentally" lose all of those cell lines in their labs and off-site storage facilities? If Frank went into hiding, another, second company could come, extract cells from him and this time cut Frank in for a share of the profits.
Well Frank of course agrees, but that is where it gets interesting. Faced with a devastating financial blow, Rick and BioGen need those cell lines. They get a court order for Frank to show up and give more samples - after all, BioGen "owns" Frank's cells - but he is a no show. However, they know that Frank has a daughter and a grandson, and they go after them, hoping to extract cells from them, viewing those cells as "stolen property.
Crichton does not limit his exploration of the world of genetic engineering, culture, and the law, to these two story lines and has several unrelated or marginally related subplots and one-shot chapters exploring various other issues, including issues relating to patenting entire species of wild animals, when hospitals make a profit from the body parts of deceased patients, and the rights of anonymous sperm donors in a world of DNA testing.
Though generally interesting, they didn't always relate to what I viewed as the two main plots and one of these plot lines was better as an intellectual exercise and didn't do much as entertaining fiction. I found that the book ended a bit too neatly in some ways, as too many seemingly unrelated plotlines converged at the end, including one with a wise-cracking transgenic parrot by the name of Gerard. The writing though overall was good and I liked how he portrayed most of the characters.
Unusually for a work of fiction, Crichton included a list of conclusions he reached from his research for the book. An appendix detailed five suggestions to avoid some of the insanity he had just portrayed, namely stop patenting genes that one he went into at length , establish clear guidelines for the use of human tissue particularly with regards to donor rights , pass laws to make sure data about genetic testing is made public he stated that some researchers have tried to prevent data about patient deaths resulting from genetic therapy getting into the public media, claiming such information is a trade secret , avoid bans on research he wrote that they can't be enforced anyway , and rescind the Bayh-Dole Act legislation which ended up seriously blurring the line between academic research and private industry and producing too many scientists motivated by personal financial interests in their research and results.
He also included an extensive bibliography with comments on each book or article. Dec 06, Jason rated it liked it Shelves: own. Science runs amok when introduced to the profit motive. This is a work of fiction, but firmly rooted in the possibilities of today.
Upcoming ninth novel | The Expanse Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia
Genetic capitalization, that is the name of the game and Crichton spins multiples stories that all revolve around how the progress of science can be and likely already is used and abused for capital gains. In a world that has seen the proliferation of drug commercials, sky-rocketing drug costs, and morally ambiguous legal decisions regarding big pharma, much of wha Science runs amok when introduced to the profit motive.
In a world that has seen the proliferation of drug commercials, sky-rocketing drug costs, and morally ambiguous legal decisions regarding big pharma, much of what lies between these pages is completely believable. The multiple story lines are okay, there is little to no real character development, but in the end is that what you expect from Crichton? I think not - I know I don't.
It's a page turner that will make you think a bit, and that is kind of his shtick, and there is certainly much worse out there. It's solid and entertaining. The most engaging characters, Gerard and Dave, are not even human though not completely non-human either , but they seem to have more depth than the rest of the cast all rolled together. The events will keep you reading; it's plot driven with a steady rat-a-tat drum line. Crichton is a mass seller, I understand that, and I am not about to criticize making STEM topics palatable or consumable for the masses, but there are times that his writing seems patronizing.
Do people really not know the difference between apes and monkeys? Do we need to have the fact that there is a difference between the two repeated soooo many times? Please no more Gomer Pyle characters yelling about monkeys while face-to-face with an Orangutan. I mean, every character seemed to understand how genetic engineering would basically work, but the concept of ape not monkey was beyond them - Yarg.
Feb 12, Jenni Lind - Bookcetera Reviews rated it really liked it. This book was a very random purchase in Hoboken, NJ while waiting over two hours for the next train to upstate New York to visit a friend. Next delves into scientific advancement. What is wrong, right, and where the line between them is largely overlooked. Medical related, of course, the story follows individuals as they face the consequences of things like genetic engineering, DNA decoding, This book was a very random purchase in Hoboken, NJ while waiting over two hours for the next train to upstate New York to visit a friend.
Are all the things going on in the book true? Most likely not. Could they be? Of course. That is what kept the book interesting to me. In this book I didn't really grow attached to the characters in the pages due to a lack of real character development but I did care about what they were doing to help change some for the better, some not the world in which we live.
Next is fast paced with lots of interesting tidbits of information in this sect of science, technology, and patent law. It makes the reality of cures, cloning, and judicial rulings in these matters rather scary. Not a read for everyone but if you like science and can stand an intersting book where you don't fall in love with the characters then I do recommend this book.
Jul 05, Chris rated it it was ok. It's not very often that I experience self-consciousness while reading a book. This book inspired that kind of feeling in me by its being so poorly crafted that I felt absolutely philistine.