By using this software Arduino can be simulate. Today we are going to simulate arduino in Proteus. We will test arduino Blink program with Proteus. Lets do it Did you use this instructable in your classroom? Add a Teacher Note to share how you incorporated it into your lesson. Because "compilation" compile the code and generate. Proteus is the software where we run our simulation. First make sure that you have Proteus installed in your operating system.
If not, then download and install Proteus. After run the Proteus software, If you don't find arduino in the library. Then, there is a. After that paste it into the Proteus library. I am using windows 7 operating system. After that you will find arduino in your library. Click on "Verify" button. Run the Proteus and draw the circuit like the picture.
- Asymptotic solutions of the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation?
- Freshwater Prawns: Biology and Farming.
- Algebra II Essentials For Dummies.
- ISIS PIC SIMULATION TUTORIAL.
- Categorical Statistics for Communication Research.
You can directly connect Led with pin But it is a good practice to add a ohm resistor with led in series. Resistor limits the current flow. Double click on arduino and paste the. Run the simulation by clicking "Run the simulation" button. LED is Blinking if everything is okay. In this, Isis is our silent guide. For years, sometimes hundreds of years, that truth remains hidden in a corner, unused, attracting little attention other than scorn.
Thus, there is a constant flux between experimentation and theory. Scientists only go on resolving one level of disagreement to the other. The example of the black raven, as put forward by Carl Hempel, shows us why science has such difficulty freeing itself from its perception of matter and from old accepted principles. In other words, to find something new requires openness to the unique and to something new. What we do not believe in, even if it is the truth, is therefore out of reach to us.
It is wiped from the slate of possible awareness. Unsurprisingly, novelty is the realm of the right hemisphere of the brain, which bears feminine characteristics. From the fifteenth to the twentieth century, we believed that to know the universe we had to disassemble it down to its smallest component until we found life or the soul in it. A little like me as a young child, marveling at a transistor radio and pleading for permission to take it apart in order to find the origin of the sound.
This is the realm of the left hemisphere of the brain, which bears masculine characteristics. Galileo helped with this trend as he showed that the planets could be viewed as inanimate objects moved by mechanical forces. Impressed, other scientists started viewing all nature, even people, as objects subject to the laws of physics, and they began explaining everything mechanistically. This replaced the four-thousand-year-old vitalistic approach. Biology became nothing more than a conglomerate of clever mechanisms. Nature was simply a dissectible object.
Sacredness was lost. This was a necessary step. Sadly, science based itself on what it accepted as law in the physical world and dismissed the knowledge patiently accumulated concerning the inner self. Science just negated its existence. Arguing that the inner is not the sort of thing physics deals with was, in a sense, dealing with it. This was the message received by the general population.
It became taboo, even laughable, to believe in anything linked to it. The world of the external saw unprecedented evolution, but our internal beings shrank until they were left, largely underdeveloped, in the hands of religions. With the theory of atoms, a positivist philosophy logical positivism of science arose. Positivists argued that science should deal with what is visible and tangible, with what can be measured and observed. It made sense since what was not visible and tangible was for them of the religious domain. Hypothetical reasoning was undesirable.
This explains why science became the favorite of great monetary powers, which then slowly but surely abandoned religion.
ISIS ISIS Summer Student Scheme
General laws had to be generally accepted. We do not know why they hold—the laws are simply postulated and have always been confirmed when tested, and so we are confident using them. Indeed, the American physical chemist Gilbert Lewis had theorized that light consisted of photons. Nobody ever saw a photon. The encounter between one of these photons—or quanta—with an electron became a quantum event. Max Born, a German-British physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics with Walther Bothe, demonstrated that this encounter cannot yield only one possible outcome.
On the contrary, it yielded many. According to Wolfgang Ernst Pauli—an Austrian theoretical physicist and one of the pioneers of quantum physics, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in —this meant that one needs to choose to measure either the momentum energy or the position space of a quantum element. Science had to choose one or the other. What Bohr added is that any measurement disturbs, thus influences, the system measured.
Heisenberg would prove that measure of one aspect of the system closes the door on what else could be found. A scientist cannot start from scratch and expect to discover all there is to find in one short life. Despite attracting highly individualistic personalities, science commanded a fraternity between researchers in order for any progress to be made. Each new theory has to manage the susceptibilities and sensibilities of well-established scientists.
The same applies to religions. Quantum physics, however, overthrew the rules with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; that is, that the observer, by the mere fact of observing, changes the observed. It was a paradigm shift. With relativity and quantum physics, a new era for science and religion had begun, closing the gap between matter and energy.
Subscribe to RSS
Once it surfaces in the general awareness, it will have profound effects on humanity. As the experimental biophysicist Mae-Wan Ho confirms the following: Quantum physics is the culmination of a long series of attempts to fragment reality into the smallest particle; only when physicists got down to the infinitesimal, indivisible quantum, they find that the whole exercise was futile: it cannot be done at all!
Moreover, the same act of observation can simultaneously determine the state of a system which is widely separated from the one observed, as though reality were indeed, an organic, universal whole. This has prompted David Bohm and his colleagues to reformulate quantum theory on the basis of universal wholeness: every particle or being is embedded in a field, or quantum potential consisting of the influences from every other being in the universe.
From this perspective, wholeness and interconnectedness are actual and primary, just as fragmentation and separation are illusory. The same can be said of the mental tools we use to comprehend reality. We can use one tool, which is synthesis, and see the big picture; or use the other tool, which is analysis, and see the particular.
The particular is not the whole truth. The human brain functions using both views. In western society, since the fourth century BC the time of the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus , we have favored analysis, endowing it with rationality. Not surprisingly, this is the worldview of the left hemisphere of the brain, the one with more masculine properties. Nevertheless, if we used both views alternately, the observations we made would acquire more depth. Consider how the two eyes function. The separate images received by each one combine into a single one. The slight angle difference of the images received by the two eyes gives depth to the image.
Moreover, people think and learn best in three dimensions. When scanning a text, the brain will absorb approximatively bits per second, while a three-dimensional image will yield 1 billion bits per second. To see life through analysis and synthesis gives it dimension.
This fact now orients science toward system thinking. This is the direction I have taken for the last twenty odd years, for I believe it is the only way to have a more truthful and organic understanding of the world around and inside us. Truly, nature uses those two points of view in all processes. It is the essence of homeostasis. Spring 29 Science wished to control human destiny by knowing all the secrets of the visible. Religion wished to control human destiny by knowing all the secrets of the invisible. Because of the natural evolution of humans, both went through a phase of masculine polarity governance.
Both have a desire to understand all so they can predict and control all. Both have created along the way theories that observation cannot entirely corroborate. This is normal, since they stem from the same biological apparatus that has not seen yet the summit of its evolution. The observation of the natural world, some archeologists say, brought people to religion.
I believe more accurately that it brought them to science. Science has created its separate and incomplete domain. By the same token, science is incomplete. The sacred texts rose as much from the cradle of science as they did from religion. Human evolution requires that we add consciousness to this knowledge and this could not be done without first going through a transitional state in which the masculine polarity prevailed.
Now, since this phase is almost completed, we need to acquire a holistic point of view which is possible only through the reintegration of the feminine polarity into our lives. Both science and religion view causality as an underlying immovable principle. The divergence between science and religion is in the where of this causality and the definition, the what, of reality. On the theoretical level, they meet. Modern science determined the cause to be at a lower level of laws. With the advent of theoretical sciences, this is changing. We now understand that there is a theoretical world that embraces many laws and many more phenomena.
This is truly a phenomenal revolution; a true paradigm shift. Science and religion need to merge in order to be truthful to their roots. They both refer to a cause, which is unity of the multiplicity. Both science and religion bear the same human frailties and misconceptions.
Man created a God and a Science in his image. And still does. With the discovery of America, we could have expressed a new system of thought. Instead, we reproduced the same old patterns. Science and religion need to work hand in hand if we are to get closer to a certain truth.
The relatively new world of system sciences elevates the debate and the cause. There, science of the outer and science of the inner can meet and enrich each other. Wolfgang Pauli, who is known for his work on spin theory and exclusion principle underpinning the structure of matter and chemistry , vividly demonstrated this.
His opinions were vital to the scientific discoveries attributed to William Heisenberg and Niels Bohr. He was influenced, as were so many others, by Carl Gustav Jung. It indicates that consciousness [awareness] does not grow out of any activity that is inherent to it; rather, it is constantly being produced by an energy that comes from the depths of the unconscious and thus has been depicted in the forms of rays from time immemorial. It uses the internal to interpret the external. Linked to human mortal nature, however, it cannot bring us to the truth if we stay with its superficial, time-related words.
The human condition of the medium and receiver limits the accuracy of the religious message. Only the substrata, the matrix of these writings, the system behind the writings, can enlighten us on human reality. Paul Dirac was protesting against prominent scientists who still believed in God. Jung: If we speak of belief, it is that we have lost knowledge.
Belief and non-belief in God are only substitutes.
Full Ground Station Kit for S-band
In his naivety, the primitive does not believe, he knows, because he gives, with reason, as much value to inner experience as to outer experience. He does not have theology and did not let his spirit be obscured by stupidly astute concepts. He orients his life —through necessity- following exterior facts as well as interior ones which, contrary to us, he does not feel and live as separated.
He lives in a whole world, and we live, us, in half a world and only believe, or not, in the other half. In other words, we live at the light of electricity which we have fabricated ourselves and—summit of irony—we either believe or not in the sun… xv Science, on the other hand, uses the analytical dissection of the outer world, relying on the 4. It uses the external solely to draw conclusions regarding the internal.
Where one of these approaches becomes powerless, the other becomes almighty. They are the two sides of the same coin. Both are necessary to attain knowledge if we ever want to understand the whole of human reality. A productive approach requires true experience, which must include both external and internal experiences.
The chemical-mechanistic theory has provided a better understanding of chemical reactions and mechanistic problems, guiding us toward an extraordinary technological revolution. For example, we have wonderful new tools for surgery and diagnosis. Unfortunately, in this solely analytical view of the smallest components of molecular biology, too many physicians have lost sight of life and of the fact that individuals are unique.
Humans have become mere machines in need of fixing. Dignity and sanctity of life nowadays are only romantic notions for dreamers and poets and useful simply to fund research. In their turn, these companies, unfortunately, seem primarily interested in pleasing their shareholders.
Datamonitor forecasts the schizophrenia market to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 1. Historic and future — sales dynamics of schizophrenia brands, generics, and pipeline agents … several major unmet needs remain, including improved patient compliance, solutions for partial responders or treatment refractory patients … the opportunity remains for developers to address the lucrative patient population suffering from negative and cognitive impairment. Obviously, one cannot solve a problem using the kind of thinking that generated the problem. We must first admit that scientists have always relied heavily on intuition, visions, and hunches as much as on analysis in the design of their theories, even though they seldom admit that.
For example, Niels Bohr, who gave us the atomic model, posed the concept that electrons, negatively charged, gravitated around a positive nucleus in order to maintain harmony in the atom. These electrons, he also proposed, can transit from one orbit to another. Another example is that of August Kekule, the German chemist, who devised the ring structure of the benzene molecule.
He admitted the inspiration came to him while he was half-asleep in his fi reside armchair, dreaming about snakes catching their tails. We normally call this armchair science. Elsewhere, in a conversation with Einstein, who disliked the matrix mechanics, Heisenberg protested that the strange developments relating to it had been forced on him since he had to devise a theory avoiding unknowable internal dynamics. Heisenberg asked. As I stated before, many of the physicists who entered the world of special relativity and quantum physics became familiar with the ideas of psychoanalyst Carl Gustav Jung.
The problem with modern science dogma is that its models build on the possibility of making general statements. They are thus dependent on testability reproduction of data by repetition. If we simply look at ourselves, we know that this is true. No two humans have the same fingerprints, or the same voice.
No two humans are exactly alike. In addition, as scientists entered the world of the intangible, of molecular invisibility, they had to rely on seemingly more subjective theories. In , Rutherford had already complicated the debate with his transmutation theory. The supposedly indivisible parts of the elements, the atoms, were not permanent! System science was, and is, the only possible answer. Even if there are many types of energy, we can ultimately visualize them as similar to the same primordial electromagnetic spectrum. We only have to consider the action of the sun on a flower to understand this.
All is linked because, ultimately, it is of the same nature. This is fascinating. The sciences of biology, chemistry, and physics would gain—and we would as well—if they worked toward fitting in the same common universal system. They developed in different directions but should ultimately show us a unified world. We specialized ourselves so much that every scientific field became like a different country with its own language, history, culture, belief system, corporations, heroes, and foes.
There is little chance, when one resides outside of these countries, not to be perceived as a stranger and a possible threat. Luckily, globalization, through multidisciplinary contributions and research, is slowly changing this.
In fact, even with the Big Bang theory, we have to accept that everything in the physical world has a dual existence, sometime behaving as a particle, sometime as a wave. Our world is part of a gigantic electromagnetic field. We should therefore be totally in tune with this energy that makes up our bodies. True, we are made of stardust, but this stardust is energy. Therefore, it is not surprising that geneticists use direct-current pulses to jumpstart mitosis and eventually produce clones. Recently, alternating electrical fields were used in the fight against brain cancer, by interfering with the division of malignant tumor cells.
In the brain, normal cells do not divide, but cancer cells do. Photons are the units of light. They have no mass, but great consequences. Of course, there are different types of energy—the ones linked to mass and the ones linked to radiations and the ones linked to information. This last type is gaining interest. For us, it is the implicate order carried out by the general Master of the Heart. This field is the latest addition to the list started by Michael Faraday, which now comprises the zero point- field, the universal EM-field electromagnetic , universal G-field attraction , and the universal Higgs field mass.
Will some of these fields eventually merge and be understood as one? This universe is changing. The whole of the universe evolves, not just us, the inhabitants of planet Earth. At its birth, it seems Earth was awash in a sea of cosmic neutrinos. These sub-atomic particles zip around and through us at nearly the speed of light. In contrast, estimates now show the current universe consists of 4. What does it say about the aim of evolution? It seems to point toward a general transformation into dark energy. There are tremendous implications to this.
Consulting a lecture given by Michael Faraday, subsequently published in , I was impressed by how he could communicate his love for nature through his observation of different phenomena. He presented himself as a natural philosopher and distinguished between vital powers and elementary physical ones. Why this distinction? Because at the time, the physical body was thought to be separate from its environment, as if in a bubble, and the energies it contained had nothing to do with the energies of the lowly physical world.
Man was a special creature of God and had nothing to do with the soulless lower realms. Scientists were specializing in areas that became increasingly disconnected from each other in the terms they used, and even by their interpretations of the physical world. In this lecture, Faraday marvels at the fact that the powers governing all phenomena in nature are so few. He summarizes these forces as such: all bodies possess an attraction, every one toward another.
This he names gravity. He goes on to talk about the chemical attraction of particles, which are in affinity, about the attraction of different type of particles, and about the power of heat energy to expand or contract bodies. He summarizes the attractions as gravity, chemical affinity, adhesion, and electricity. He then goes on to talk about magnetism. Magnets have the attraction of gravitation, the attraction of cohesion, and a certain chemical attraction. It is a separate and dual attraction, which is as continuous as the gravity attraction.
He then shows a magnet and its two ends, the one containing a power of attraction and the other a power of repulsion. He showed that the powers can be changed from one into the other.
ISIS Software engineer for ISIS business systems
Thus these two powers, repulsion and attraction, are one, used in two different expressions. He ends by saying: What study other than of the laws by which this universe is governed is there more fitted to the mind of man than that of physical sciences? And what is there more capable of giving him [the man] an insight into the actions of those laws, a knowledge of which gives interest to the most trifling phenomenon of nature, and make the observing student find tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, sermons in stones, and good in everything.
He took the last sentence from Shakespeare. Viewed in this manner, this science, from the phenomenon, elevated Man toward the sacred. That knowledge, I deeply love. In a sense, both are saying the same thing, as one causes the other. As we will later see, this openness to and awareness of the sacred are key elements that distinguish us from other mammals. From time immemorial, we have tried to understand ourselves, our purpose, where we come from, where we fit in the scheme of things, and how to best live these short lives of ours.
One of the first things we learn is that we are profoundly social creatures and that it is easier to survive in a community than alone. Many animals have this socializing instinct. Nevertheless, we humans seem to have made human exchanges necessary to our mental health. Those who reflect upon the human condition have used analysis—dividing something into different parts—to convey a sense of understanding, through the study of physical laws, to a greater group of people. This was a step forward compared to the reactive nature of the emotional level. It allowed a better comprehension and a universalization of the concept of what a human is.
Humans became not only those living in the same tribal community, but also included strangers. At this phase of human evolution, however, we have to ask: Can we truly understand the sum through the exclusive study of the visible parts, as we did until now to define humans?
If we consider ourselves as inanimate, yes. Unfortunately, it is not that easy. Life imparts a holistic condition to matter, resulting in the sum being more than the compilation of the different parts. Laws now have to be integrated in the system which gave them birth. In a nutshell, energy—or information, order, intelligence, consciousness, whatever name we want to give it—gave rise to life and awareness through evolution.
The essence of this Consciousness, as associated with a possible fifth dimension, can be seen as a more fundamental aspect of reality, while the tangible world would be only its reflected aspect. This is in agreement with the latest scientific discoveries concerning the brain and quantum physics. Consciousness would be this fundamental aspect of reality, this reference frequency of a holographic universe.
In agreement with this, the brain appears as a complex frequency analyzer, an oscillatory system merged with the environment. Stanford neuroscientist Karl Pribram observed that when brain- injured patients had large portions of their brains removed, they did not suffer a loss of any specific memories. The rats retained their maze-running knowledge. In , Pribram concluded that memories are distributed throughout the whole brain. Personally, I see memories as informing the cellular matrix throughout the whole body. The brain has elements associated with certain memory-retrieval features, but the whole body memorizes.
There is the memory you can voice and analyze expressed by the brain and the one that is on the subconscious and cellular level associated in part to the cellular matrix. Like Bohm, Pribram used the holographic paradigm to explain the functioning of the brain. In particular, the fact that information is distributed throughout the hologram, so that each piece of it contains information about the entire image, showed him how the brain could encode memories.
See the section in chapter 2 entitled, Isis and Osiris, the legend. Using salamanders, he did everything imaginable to their brains. All objects within perceived reality are thus endowed with a reflection of Consciousness. The difference is in its manifestation and expression. Therefore, all objects are interrelated and interdependent. Consciousness is an essential property of the universe, being present at the beginning as well as developed later as an epiphenomenon.
The brain gradually acquires its self- awareness by learning to predict the neuronal performance of other brains. In other words, acquisition of self- consciousness requires feedback from other brains. The Egyptian tradition divided the human into nine different parts, bearer of nine different functions or attributes of this underlying Consciousness. The scholars who study Egyptian philosophy do not agree over the exact meaning of each part, so I will not attempt it either.
What is of interest to us here is that the belief system of ancient Egypt is the closest to the idea that everything is energy, more or less condensed, with the body and its visible matter being only one-ninth of a total human. It is merely the tail of the cat, so to speak. Egyptian high priests deduced that energy also known by the Hindu as prana, and chi by the Chinese comes and inhabits matter in a condensed form.
Without a constant feeding of these energies, the matter loses its organization, dissolves, and eventually reintegrates into the environment, while this parcel of Consciousness, similar to a ray of light, has stopped shining on it. For all the embalmed mummies, they certainly noticed that none came back to life, so the knowledge behind embalmment is probably more profound than we are ready to admit and is possibly associated to a concept of reincarnation.
To translate the Egyptian theory into Westerner and Christian language, we would say that matter is condensed spirit and that there is nothing outside this spirit. Everything is a crystallization of it, and is thus sacred. As such, physical bodies are simply structured crystallizations. This is in harmony with the fact that we cannot precisely define what energy is, except as potential of information in space and time. Physics describes it as working potential. We only know how to label its various manifestations. In the same way, we cannot see a photon or electricity or magnetism.
We can only see their manifestation. One remark must then be made: it is therefore not the gigantic which opens the door to infinity, but the infinitesimal. Infinity and infinitesimal are, after all, of the same Latin origin: infinitus. The fifth dimension does not shine from without but from within. Scientific and religious men tried to find a cause behind the different phenomenon. Science, which considers the universe a closed system, chose natural laws, which it also proceeded to define.
By doing so, science limited man to matter. We erred both ways. Many people are unwittingly using themselves or their situations as an ultimate cause. If I act well, nothing bad will happen to me. This is like a child who still does not know right from wrong and needs his parents to show him the way. With his developing frontal lobe, this child often tries to manipulate his parents into doing what he wants. Since the strict control of behavior does not necessarily equal peace and happiness, the reward for good behavior became a place and was displaced to the future.
It had to be better than dreams, so that all the pain endured in this life would be worth it. Then you can hardly be a saint. Reincarnation uses a similar stratagem, displacing in time not only reward but also punishment. Hell is here and paradise is the future; or it is the reverse, depending on how we act or acted. In any case, too often we consider that the world is ours to use and abuse and God will help us. We created this god, inevitably, in the image of human imperfections.
This is an egocentric, immature point of view, leading to an egocentric, immature religion. On the scientific side, many scientists still use the material world as the ultimate cause. What if the imaginary boundary we have put on the universe to allow computations was, in fact, imaginary? What if the ten dimensions of the superstring theories influenced one another?
Some believe that chemistry, hormones, the brain are the cause instead of the medium of feelings, thoughts, inspiration. They see thoughts as emerging from the body. Otherwise we should believe a radio is the source of the sound it emits. Some also believe that we had discovered everything and nothing is left to find. They naively consider they control everything, since they have in their hands a few formulas that they trust summarize the universe. New phenomena will require new actions, new funding.
This forces us to live in a somewhat chaotic mental world, since many phenomena have not yet been explained. They are piling up in a corner of the human mental egregore. Some believe thoughts and feelings are only objects, figments of imagination that emerge from physical conditions.
These people live in fear of the unknown and wish to feel the firm ground under their feet. Whatever problems arise, they believe science will solve it. The world is ours to use and abuse, and science will help us. This science, created by us, is inevitably in the image of human imperfections. This is also an egocentric and immature point of view leading to an egocentric science.
Both science and religion have codes of belief. Both proceed from different aspects of the brain to appraise life. Science, unknowingly, uses tools from the emotional level and from the logical level with an emphasis on the logical. Religion as we know it uses tools from the emotional level and tools from the logical level with an emphasis on the emotional.
Depending on people, on their maturity, motivation and experiences, some will lean more on one side than the other, and never be complete. However, a new trend surfaces. In the same manner electricity becomes magnetism, science is becoming metaphysical. Is it really surprising when we know Moses grew up surrounded by the Egyptian and then the Babylonian cultures? The universal laws expressed in the Kabbalah, of course, predate Moses and even the Kabbalah itself. It seems that in most traditions, including the scientific one, we can find a similar universal skeleton on which all is built.
Religion and science have the same root, the same DNA. Therefore, we can find it. It is the sefirot house of unification. In the Greek tradition, Pherecydes of Syros in his writings represents it as a meshed veil sprinkled with the elements of creation Zeus presented to, and wrapped around, Chtonie the physical world xxv.
It sets the order of the universe from chaos, when creation or manifestation occurs, and is the personification of the fundamental order of the universe. It is the sieve through which the unmanifested receives organization. It is similar to the dharma and the Tao, a vast field of consciousness and potentialities that constitute the primary reality of the universe.
It is unified and nonlocal.
It is the implicate order. In the Hindu cosmogony, this plenum is similar to Aditi, the highest Akasha, womb of space, synthesis of all things, and divine wisdom. In Kabbalah, it is Binah, the higher mother and cognition. Hearing is associated with Binah. In the Egyptian tradition, it is Tefnut. Now the divisions I will put forward could pose problems for those who have no experience with and therefore have no belief in a subtler world. I will do my utmost to use in part what our materialistic science has discovered.
This is the reason why I refer to the brain, vector, and fractal element of this implicate order. The terms become limiting when we use divisions in the world of imponderable matter. Bear with me and take it as a cultural discovery of ancient traditions. I will attempt to use accepted notions as much as possible to divide the human being into parts. They are schematic, not exhaustive. This book is written with the desire to share some findings and hopefully orient us toward more discoveries and a better understanding of ourselves.
As the French chemist Antoine Lavoisier demonstrated in the late s, nothing is lost, nothing is created, and all is transformed. A long time before Lavoisier, Socrates said the same in other words: everything comes out of everything. Thus, every action eventually becomes a cause, with repercussions on the whole. Scientists therefore consider the universe a closed system, although we now know that new space is regularly created.
One intriguing aspect of the superstring theory is the concept of extra dimensionality. Extra dimensions consist of dimensions of both space and time. Could there be other dimensions not affected by time and space? Potential dimensions? According to the latest in M-theory, an extension of string theory, the higher dimensions are not affected by time. Time is a dimension in itself, so it only applies in the lower dimensions.
Said differently, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. We also know that nothing affects the speed of light in a vacuum. This light is an electromagnetic radiation ranging in wavelength from the shortest—the gamma rays—to the longest—the radio waves, which have the lowest energy photons.
The earth bathes in these energies. They contain a higher energetic level. In comparison, gamma rays have a higher energetic content than visible light. Translated by analogy to a human being, the subtler aspects will consist of higher energies, endowed of a natural propensity toward denser ones. The subtler aspects consist of higher energetic properties with stronger informative potential and stronger effects although these will take longer to manifest in the denser world.
Emotions have a high energy content and are somewhat closer to the physical world than ideas. Hence, they motivate us toward action more rapidly than ideas can. We also know that the molecules of a solid are not free to rotate or to move through space, but they can oscillate, storing energy in that manner. These become charged elements, opposed in time and complementary in space since the receiver can eventually become the giver. Indeed, Charles-August de Coulomb, in the late eighteenth century, observed that charge manifests itself in two opposing forms.
This discovery led to the well-known axiom that like-charged objects repel and opposite-charged objects attract. Of course, the aspect or element that gives its energy can eventually become a receiver of energy. These are always, we should remember, in comparison of one aspect to the other in time, but not an absolute. This is also the realm of the physical world known matter , which does not mean that one day we will not find something more energetic than gamma rays.
All scientific theories are built upon a certain perception of what matter is. This determines our present point of view of the world, our conceived and accepted ideas. Those ideas are not an absolute. To look at the example of temperature again. The coldest temperature possible as established by science is At that temperature energy has been totally extracted from the atom. We do not know the warmest temperature, which must have been during the Big Bang. Contrary to dense matter, temperature, as we remember, does not affect light in a vacuum. Light is above matter, energetically speaking.
It appears to me as the highest science since it takes into account the amazing uniqueness of nature. This is what Pauli, Jung, Bohm and many others were searching for. Thus, we can change as the environment changes. We humans have the greatest effect and control on this environment.
We can therefore control our own evolution, for better or for worse. It is a serious responsibility, and implies that the cautionary principle should be used in all actions directed toward the environment. In a sense, God has nothing to do with it. He already did His work. We now live the unfolding. Roles are predetermined.
Who fulfills them and how well is not. The system is unchanging in its structures and functions. The objects of its application, however, can evolve. They are not distinct, but rather flow from one to the other, as would the different colors of a rainbow. To continue with the rainbow analogy, purple would be analogous to the symbolic aspect, and red, more materialized, to the physical one.
If we join two rainbows together to complete a circle, we can observe that the purple is central and the red peripheral diagram 4. The symbolic aspect—some would say spiritual—is consequently the center of our being, the Self. This most condensed aspect of ourselves, and thus the most receptive to higher levels of energy, is the medium we use in this world.
It is not the origin but the consequence. It is the grail of our symbolic level psyche. If the body is a crystallization of those subtler aspects, then its features should be linked to, and the expression of, these subtler aspects. Many ancient traditions developed their medicine around this concept. My own experience is with the theory of the law of the five elements pertaining to TCM. DeBavelaere in medical biocybernetics, as well as results from the most recent brain research and my own observations.
This understanding of the five elements seems to have been with humanity since its beginning. This is, in fact, a holistic knowledge system by which we live, similar to that of our ancestors when science and religion were still united. It is a science and a religion combined, as they should be; a way of life. The research and consideration pertaining to it provide a better understanding of our personal and individual natures on different levels. I did not create a melting pot, but sought the skeleton that every tradition dresses up, depending on time and political and social developments.
This is the sieve I was referring to previously diagram 5. This skeleton projects in nature itself. Of course, this system does not belong to a country, a race, an association, a school, or a person. It simply is, in the same way the elements in nature are, in the same way physical laws exist. It is universal.
It can be expanded on to the infinite, which is what many cultures did, but the essential aspects remain the same. Someone said that all the great religious traditions have many points in common not because they are right or refer to the same God, but because they emerged from the same cells within the brain. It is an astute observation and has some obvious truth in it. Similarly, radios all emit sounds when currents goes through them.
It could similarly apply to science to explain both its findings and limitations. Quite the opposite. We all manifest ourselves through the same natural laws, the same type of brain, the same biosystem, so all our creations more or less have these same imprints and limitations attached to them. The wonderful thing about this is that genius can be understood or at least felt by all of us. It can awaken dormant knowledge and help accelerate our evolution. If two people are in affinity with the same model, they are also in affinity with each other.
This is what religion tries to achieve. This also explains the necessity for a society to look toward a same model to succeed in strengthening its social fabric. It is the zeroth law of thermodynamics xxvi i i applied to our psychology. We can observe that we have developed elements that do not make sense in a uniquely emerging and Newtonian-type evolution. Take this notion of sacrificing for something that does not positively affect our lives, genetic pool, or the lives of our close ones.
Sacrificing for an idea or the future, for example. This becomes more apparent with the development of the prefrontal lobe, although we can find the structure of sacrifice in lower orders of the animal world, such as in the world of insects. The bee will sacrifice itself for its community, and the ant has a second digestive pouch for the benefit of hungry nest mates. In the same way, a vampire bat that had a successful night of feeding will regurgitate blood for its less fortunate companions.
In the animal world, we find numerous stunning displays of sacrifice to protect and provide the best care for off spring. Where does sacrifice fit in? As the acorn of the oak tree contains the blueprint of the mature oak tree, for every kingdom potentialities are all in the gene genetic or in the Master of the Heart epigenetic. These potentialities include, for every kingdom, the feminine polarity. Are we only shaped by opportunity, or is there a direction to evolution?
In accordance with the evolution of the universe, it seems that the most evolved is also the most energetically efficient, needs little but the most subtle fuels. The fact science found that those humans who eat less live longer points in this direction. It appears that, unlike dinosaurs, the most evolved can process adequately different types of energies or information as well as vast quantities of them. Nature also seems to favor multiplicity and uniqueness.
Spring 47 We can see this through the example of the hummingbird. Hummingbirds are the second most diverse bird family on earth, they can fly backward and are the only birds to do so, they are brightly colored, their wings are hollow and fragile, and it is a mystery how they survive. These little birds can fly nonstop km miles! I believe so. We know that only the mutations that are best adapted have remained. The question is, best adapted for what? The LIFE biosystem points to the answer.