- The Economics of Transition: From Socialist Economy to Market Economy.
- Understanding And Implementing the Finite Element Method!
- Crème Brûlée?
This has the sole effect to reveal the flaws that humanity has. Victor, therefore, stands condemned in the eyes of the reader when it becomes clear that he is the source of this evil. Symbolically, therefore, the creature presents a double in the novel to refer back to him.
- Contemporary Yugoslav Philosophy: The Analytic Approach.
- Italian Phrases For Dummies?
- The Fear of Barbarians: Beyond the Clash of Civilizations.
- Control Engineering: A Modern Approach!
- Frankenstein And Morality By Victor Frankenstein.
- Product description.
- Full Circle (Castings, Book 3)!
The movement of the creature in search for knowledge and to understand humanity, the reader understands that Victor seeks to understand the society which is of higher creation from a higher scientific status than his Shelley, p He, thus, finds that people are not humane at all and, therefore, evil is to human not to creatures or products of human knowledge application. Humanity comes out clearly as a system that believes and advocates for suppression of others as well as exclusion.
The creature as a being that transcends any limits of the construction of humanity reminds the reader that it creates boundaries which are meant to only bring evil to the society Smith and Shelley, p. The use of a monster by Shelley powerfully points to the fact that our selfish, thoughtless and restrictive society leads to evil things that eventually turn against us.
What is Kobo Super Points?
These evils do not help but rather add to misery created and justified through high science and intellect. This is evident on the fact that Victor runs away from his creation rather than training it to understand the humanity language as well as codes used in the society.
He, therefore, repeats the same mistake when his sister, Moritz, is accused of murder and he does nothing to protect her despite his knowledge. It, therefore, becomes clear that Victor is the source of the evil nature of the monster. The rejection that the creature receives from all sides of the society as a result of its ugliness results in hate and vengeance which violates more the human society standards of practice and beliefs. In this sense, therefore, the creature is one not to be blamed but its creator and, therefore, the evil nature as a result of human actions.
Victor actually professes this when he observes that he may be the murderer of the persons that were killed by the creator Glut, p.
Accountability Frankenstein: Understanding and Taming the Monster - Sherman Dorn - Google книги
She observes that lofty ambitions lead to immoral actions that lead to fallen states of human nature. The fallen states only lead to death and, therefore, Victor advises Walton to abandon his ambitions of travels to the icy North. This would have led to his death and also cause misery to the family of his fellow men counterparts Shmoop, p. Shelley further treats the idea of secrecy just like morality. According to this work, the need for the society to know and acknowledge the truth through recognized and measured standards leads to the release of burden and free of guilt.
It is only after Victor lays bare his secrets to Walton that the whole situation becomes rested.
Frankenstein discovers the eternal ideals that help him to realize that he is on the wrong through actions. Shelley, therefore, pegs the importance of truth to life changing situations and revelations that are necessary and, hence, placing it as a center of right and wrong Levine, p. If humans observed and allowed truth to prevail, then the ills of the society like the one caused by Victor would be no more Literature Essays n.
- Accountability Frankenstein: understanding and taming the monster - Sherman Dorn - Google книги.
- Encyclopedia of Modern Ethnic Conflicts.
- Join Kobo & start eReading today.
- DON’T TREAD ON ME: An interview with Mike Page of the Oakland County, Michigan Militia (1).
In this position, Shelley places herself at a higher moral point than the reader and, hence, requires people to exercise truth in all of their lives. The expectation of punishment is self meted in the case of Victor and justice for the creature is attained by the soul and body afflictions of his creator.
As for Victor, he gets his rewards in kind and this is what he realizes at the end of his life. He recognizes that those were empty pursuits that should not be followed by any human being who values his life and sanity Smith and Shelley, p. Maguire clearly depicts the consequences of living a life that too well is known to cause despair and death.
In this novel, conspiracies created by Maguire creatively depict betrayals murders that occur in the witches land as a result of lies that bind. What becomes of these witches by the end of the day is death and pain the truth gets revealed by different parts and characters interested in setting things for own personal gains. In this novel, the author Maguire presents the story of Elphaba as a no ordinary child destined for sorcery but born in a religious family. She is, however, different in that she does not use her meaning to threaten and kill other people unless as it becomes necessary Levine and Knoepflmacher, p.
Upon examination of these two novels, therefore, Shelley and Maguire examine the issues of truth and its implication to the human as well as super human experience. It becomes clear that any attempts to withhold truth, at one point, lead to evil situations that are dangerous Milner, p. In conclusion, therefore, this paper supports the proposition that the monster in Frankenstein text can be absolved from blame since the evil in its is a reflection of the human society characterized and embodied by Victor. At the same time, it is clear that Shelley used this monster in order to describe the inadequacies of human nature from limitless position in the society.
Indeed the monster realizes the gender codes for real humans to be very confusing and unbelievable, hence, the translation that human society is full if flaws. To add salt to injury, humanity through stupidity leaves things to sort themselves out after serious triggering the occurrence of such scenarios. If truth is allowed to prevail in both novels then the situations that lead to such ugly scenes and loss of life will be averted leading to peaceful societies.
The intention to the audience for these works can not be underemphasized since they deal with issues that are presented from the moral point of view, hence, reflecting some the demarcations of human life. My claims here come from a historical perspective and a fear that the century-long culture of student- and family-blaming will swallow the formative assessment and Response to Intervention models, with the claims of high-stakes accountability advocates hollowed out as a consequence.
My hope is that principals can shape schools to be places that are positive and focused, but my direct connection with schools right now is with my children who are students and relatives who teach. Readers, what do you think: is there a chance to use assessment in a useful way, and if so, how? Calhoun, D. The intelligence of a people. Cuban, L. How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press. Deno, S. Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities.
School Psychology Review, 30 4 , Dorn, S. Accountability Frankenstein: Understanding and taming the monster. Fuchs, L. Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22 1 , Mazzeo, C. Frameworks of state: Assessment policy in historical perspective. Teachers College Record, 3 , Tyack, D. The one best system: A history of American urban education.
Wilson, T. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Overview To understand the current moment in school accountability, one must understand the larger contradictions in education politics. Accountability Frankenstein provides a broader perspective on the school accountability debate by exploring the contradictions inherent in high-stakes testing. Accountability Frankenstein explains the historical and social origins of test-based accountability: the political roots of accountability, why we trust test scores while we distrust teachers, the assumptions behind formulaic accountability systems, and the weaknesses with the current carrot-and-stick approach to motivating teachers.
Accountability Frankenstein answers the questions of educators and parents who want to understand the origins of accountability. This book challenges the beliefs of fierce advocates and opponents of high-stakes testing.